They have always been open and clear about letting you build it and use it however you like.
I don’t disagree with the want to license software like this. The downside then is a subset of “letting you build and use it any way you like” includes registering N trial accounts every 30 days. If this isn’t actually spelled out as illegal under the license, some jerkbag will do it. I wish we didn’t live in this world, but we do.
INeedMana@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I’m not convinced. It all started from a license saying “if you want to distribute your version, you have to license it the same”. One either plays by the rules or the modification doesn’t see the light of day. And at the time of publication, it was rather radical stance
Freedom sometimes has to be enforced
This is not a story about a company denying free trial to another company because the latter is big. It’s about the latter leeching resources from supporters who’s money go towards the fleet that serves their 4k VM “trial”
It is against the spirit of FOSS
mosiacmango@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Vates is pretty chill, as is clear in the article. I think you can argue the above clearly, but lets say that Vates likes the “vibe” of FOSS, and is willing to take it a bit on the chin to keep that energy internally. A bit of “turn the other cheek.”
Well, even Jesus started kicking ass at one point with the money lenders. It looks like they are getting there now.