rbos@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago Alternately, Super Serious humourless douchebags pretending to be All Grown Up and overlooking powerful functionality because they don’t like the picture on the box.
Some people need to get over their obsession with appearance and face.
Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
The picture on the box matters, its absurd thinking it doesn’t
Reducto absurdum: Would you buy a car with a big dick and balls for a logo, but you can pay extra to have it removed?
I mean, I’d look at the specs first. Because it’s just a logo. Show me the numbers that actually matter.
That said, there are imagery that would give me pause, obviously. I suspect we’d just draw the line in very different places.
If it harms nobody, let people have fun.
Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
I am not the problem, I don’t care about the mascot.
It’s incorporating it at work that is the issue.
Yes you might buy a car with a dick and balls logo for personal use, but would you try to convince your managers to buy it for the company?
I might, if the specs were good.
kossa@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
More like…convince the managers to use the car for free with dick and balls logo or pay for it to have another logo?! If the car does what it should and is better than the alternatives, a good manager would probably pay up ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Have you ever seen corporate branded truck nuts? Because I have, and those companies paid to add it in.