They have been following me around on Lemmy the last couple of hours and called me a fascist and liar among many other falsehoods 🤷
Comment on [deleted]
CTDummy@lemm.ee 2 days ago
I think it speaks for itself.
It does not.
poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 days ago
Count042@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
It’s Lemmy.
The user base is tiny. And clients have tags.
For example, I didn’t follow you here. But, because I have your account tagged as ‘Rhodesia Lover’ I know whenever I see your account elsewhere, like here, you’re the racist that believes that unless there is a complete destruction of everyone involved that there is continuity of government.
So, by your definition, basically the only governments that don’t have continuity is…
…
I guess Paraguay before and after the War of the Triple Alliance.
poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
No, a good example would have been the Frelimo fight against the Portuguese colonialists in Mozambique that resulted in a declaration of independence and the creation of a new state.
The example of Zimbabwe is is somewhere between that and the relatively reformist transition in South Africa, as Rhodesia (in agreement with their government) briefly reverted to being a British colony on paper to conduct elections which the previous rebel forces won and then formally declared independence from the UK.
I find it highly slanderous to be labled a “Rhodesia lover” for simply stating historical facts. Rhodesia was a racist apartheit state I am absolutly opposed to.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
They’re basing their claim on their assumption that anyone who disagrees with them or downvote them is actually a sockpuppet of me, and the cretins here believe them because their tribalist dumbasses.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
They have been following me around on Lemmy the last couple of hours
That’s a damn lie and you know it.
called me a fascist and liar
And stand by it, especially given that you’re lying about me right now.
poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 days ago
The down-vote and reply pattern is clear 🤷
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
Yeah, in that it’s clear that you’re lying about me following you around
CTDummy@lemm.ee 2 days ago
That doesn’t justify someone breaking ToS and engaging in harassment in return but does provide some background I suppose.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
It’s also a damn lie, I have absolutely not been following them around
Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 days ago
While it’s unquestionable that them posting this here is not the appropriate place. It’s also unquestionable knowing how you behave that you are harassing them. Even if you are not “following them around”.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
So when they create a post literally trying to sic people on me it’s “harassment” for me to respond to it?
CTDummy@lemm.ee 2 days ago
I’m referring to you commenting on the cat post but posting “I’m in your walls” isn’t really responding to it.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
So one comment saying “I’m glad your cat is ok” constitutes “following them around and harassing them”?
Nonsense.
CTDummy@lemm.ee 2 days ago
Yes out context it can seem that way, but when you’re following a user around commenting on their stuff when you’re clearly in the middle of an argument with them makes it clear you probably aren’t just dropping by to wish their car well. OP post is 2 hours old. Your comment is an hour old. You just happened across another (8h old) post by OP to comment about their cat? Come on.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
Now Brain is saying I followed them
Yeah, by the standard you applied to me, you absolutly did. But you’re a raging hypocrite who thinks one post I made after this topic was created is what this post is about.
30p87@feddit.org 2 days ago
Yeah … the stereotypical .ml user.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
In the sense that I’m being blatantly lied about, yes.