Comment on [deleted]

remon@ani.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• my_hat_stinks@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  The British monarchy primarily “provides” money by owning land and other assets which would otherwise be government-owned. They also “earn” a shitload of money just for existing and still dump significant expenses onto taxpayers.

  source

  • remon@ani.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    They provide about 1.5 billion pounts of tourism renevenu per year, far outweighing the sovereign grants they recieve from the the government.

    source

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      You’re telling me the tourists would stop looking at British castles etc. if the UK became a republic?

      source

      • remon@ani.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I’m pretty sure the people calculating the number could distinguish between tourism for castles and the monarachy.

        source
• lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  That’s one way to see it… Countries that got rid of their monarchy, got the money in a more direct way

  source

  • remon@ani.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    What do you mean?

    source

    • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      What do you think happened to the wealth of the French king?

      source

      • remon@ani.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Pretty sure the French King isn’t bringing in any revenue anymore.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • zloubida@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      They don’t have to give money to receive it back. They just keep it, while still having tourists (cf France).

      source