That’s one way to see it… Countries that got rid of their monarchy, got the money in a more direct way
remon@ani.social 15 hours ago
The British monarchy provides quite a bit of money for the country.
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 hours ago
remon@ani.social 15 hours ago
What do you mean?
zloubida@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
They don’t have to give money to receive it back. They just keep it, while still having tourists (cf France).
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 hours ago
What do you think happened to the wealth of the French king?
remon@ani.social 12 hours ago
Pretty sure the French King isn’t bringing in any revenue anymore.
my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 15 hours ago
The British monarchy primarily “provides” money by owning land and other assets which would otherwise be government-owned. They also “earn” a shitload of money just for existing and still dump significant expenses onto taxpayers.
remon@ani.social 15 hours ago
They provide about 1.5 billion pounts of tourism renevenu per year, far outweighing the sovereign grants they recieve from the the government.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org 14 hours ago
You’re telling me the tourists would stop looking at British castles etc. if the UK became a republic?
remon@ani.social 14 hours ago
I’m pretty sure the people calculating the number could distinguish between tourism for castles and the monarachy.