It will hit the average person in ways they cant see, my firm isnt replacing retirements because they can be filled by AI. What was once a vital role has been downgraded to the point where it can be completed by an AI, their manager now handles the back office parts and AI escalationz which given their nature will reduce overtime. In a business unit of ~40 people 7 have retired without issue and there are no plans to replace the rest as they go.
CptOblivius@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Well because AI has been mostly hype and worthless. It has uses, but not as life changing as promised. And extremely energy intensive.
Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 day ago
pulsewidth@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Your customers have noticed the decline in quality, guarantee it.
Squizzy@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
No, I’d doubt it. Its quite a robust system that has been trialed extensively on a use case by case basis. Its also not directly customer facing.
AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 1 day ago
I think it could be life changing, but true progress will take time, like any tech. There’s a reason most scientists know you can’t just throw money at something and just make it work. That’s why technocracy and the idea of chosen elite is so fucking dumber.
Imagine if in the 80s we had just said ok, Steve Jobs did it. We’re done here. We don’t give any outside voices or ideas in tech a chance unless Jobs gives it the ok first. Imagine how much cool shit we would have missed out on.
Innovation and progress does not flourish in a neatly controlled box, and most people that don’t just buy other people’s work know that. That’s the real reason people started pushing for DEI. Not just bc it was the “PC” thing to do. It helps bring new perspectives which then leads to ways of thinking and problem solving.
You may get some cool shit but eventually if you just buy out the entire market to fit your singular vision you get repeating/boring and stale.