Disk space is quite cheap and I’m sure high quality vids could take a very small space if NPU processed and upscaled.
Comment on Are people blind on PeerTube?
Auli@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
Yep not sustainable. Think of how much diak space YouTube is using. Just was reading this morning how peertube instances limit new users and that’s ok. If everyone can’t upload videos it we’ll never replace YouTube.
Suoko@feddit.it 2 days ago
catloaf@lemm.ee 1 day ago
Disk space is relatively cheap, until you also count redundancy, backups, storage hardware, utilities, and bandwidth.
Suoko@feddit.it 1 day ago
Redundancy and backup is automatically provided thanks to federation, other instances can decide to host a copy of your vid (see archive.com for example).
Bandwidth is provided by torrent.
Storage HW can be anything.
Ads are supported so you can monetize
Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 days ago
Hell, using consumer grade, free tools (handbrake) I can convert a DVD to mkv and reduce the file size upwards of 75%, and still be perfectly viewable on a current 65" TV.
I can only imagine the capabilities of Google/YouTube. It would be fascinating to see a high level diagram of how they handle a video.
Ulrich@feddit.org 2 days ago
This is just 12 different kinds of incorrect.
Disk space will be the least of your concerns when running a service like YT.