This is literally just insane rambling. You need serious media literacy.
It’s not a purity test so much as a fear that publicly signaling loyalty to trump devalued their trustworthiness as private and secure. If their CEO legitimately believes that Republicans are better on tech policy than democrats because conservatives want to weaponize the federal government to control speech online, then I don’t really trust him not to cooperate with federal authorities when they want to access someone’s emails or vpn traffic. Conservatives are simply not trustworthy to me
crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub 5 days ago
anachrohack@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Tell me why I’m wrong
sudneo@lemm.ee 5 days ago
The premise is already wrong. There was no promise or loyalty, not even close.
anachrohack@lemmy.world 5 days ago
He endorsed the republican party. He said we should clean house of democrats. Is that not declaring party loyalty? It was also a completely unnecessary comment, in response to nothing. It was shortly after Trump’s election when every CEO went out of their way to kowtow to the new regime. Its transparently a loyalty pledge to the new joss
Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 5 days ago
They legally can’t though that’s the thing people are missing
StonerCowboy@lemm.ee 5 days ago
Louder for the idiots who can’t seem to listen. Preach!