the point is that making it local-only is not significantly better. it does not solve a major problem.
Comment on Tech Companies Apparently Do Not Understand Why We Dislike AI
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days agoEven with Recall, a hypothetical non-local equivalent would be significantly worse. Whether Microsoft actually has your data or not obviously matters. Most conceivable software that uses local AI wouldn’t need any kind of profile building anyway, for instance that Firefox translation feature.
The thing that’s frustrating to me here is the lack of acknowledgement that the main privacy problem with AI services is sending all queries to some company’s server where they can do whatever they want with them.
ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 3 days ago
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
So you don’t think collection of user data is a meaningful privacy problem here? How does that work?
ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 3 days ago
it is, and that is still happening.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
Software that is designed not to send your data over the internet doesn’t collect your data. That’s what local-only means. If it does send your data over the internet, then it isn’t local-only. How is it still happening?
Umbrias@beehaw.org 3 days ago
why do you care that someone didnt say it was worse enough? “x is a problem, if y is true then z is a problem” -> “why didnt you talk about x”
silly.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
What’s basically being said is, making an AI powered software local-only doesn’t make a difference and doesn’t matter. But that’s not true, and the arguments for that don’t seem coherent.