Comment on I tried another Iron Man-style exoskeleton and now I'm stronger than ever | TechRadar
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 days agoWell that’s a whole load of assumptions based on absolutely nothing…
Comment on I tried another Iron Man-style exoskeleton and now I'm stronger than ever | TechRadar
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 days agoWell that’s a whole load of assumptions based on absolutely nothing…
JamonBear@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
First example in mind: jeffgeerling.com/…/i-wont-connect-my-dishwasher-y…
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
My point being, the article lists perfectly good reasons for the app to exist, but you’ve made assumptions about it based solely on absolutely no data. What’s the point of linking an article about an unrelated app and company?
lmfamao@lemm.ee 4 days ago
The app doesn’t have to exist. Calibration can happen via other means.
You’re zeroing in on this one app’s supposed utility, missing the broader, well-documented pattern of issues with app-dependent, cloud-connected devices. The fundamental problem isn’t this specific app, but the systemic risks: data harvesting, planned obsolescence when servers shut down, and companies shifting terms post-purchase. Dismissing valid comparisons because the product category differs is a smokescreen. The concern isn’t an assumption based on nothing; it’s based on a consistent history of consumer-unfriendly practices across the IoT landscape.
Skepticism isn’t an “assumption based on nothing”; it’s pattern recognition.
JamonBear@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
Nice list!
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
Is there any indication in the article that this is even cloud dependent?
JamonBear@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
You asked why people are pissed off by apps, here is some reasons. I honestly couldn’t care less for that toy belt.
Calibration needs is not an excuse to give up on privacy.