I’m gonna bet that you’re going to get a much-more-economical return there by powdering whatever iron is used in building that thing and then dumping said iron powder into the ocean at an appropriate point.
Comment on [deleted]
iceonfire1@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Nothing is wrong with trees, but the microalgae CO2 capture rate is 50x higher````` .
tal@lemmy.today 1 day ago
jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 day ago
This technique is controversial because there is limited understanding of its complete effects on the marine ecosystem,[5] including side effects and possibly large deviations from expected behavior. Such effects potentially include release of nitrogen oxides,[6] and disruption of the ocean’s nutrient balance.[1] Controversy remains over the effectiveness of atmospheric CO2 sequestration and ecological effects.
Geoengineering is bullshit proposed by funding from fossil fuel companies so they can continue to pollute.
The solution is simple: make it illegal to pollute. Fine the companies responsible for their contributions to the climate catastrophe out of existence.
Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 1 day ago
Their lifetime is also much shorter. Guess where all that CO2 goes, when they die ^^
pikmeir@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I have a solution. More algae.
Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 1 day ago
Based and algae-pilled
Klear@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Fake and algae
jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 day ago
This is the solution. You drain it and sequester the carbon.
neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Fertilizer
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Wherever you put it?