Their lifetime is also much shorter. Guess where all that CO2 goes, when they die ^^
Comment on [deleted]
iceonfire1@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Nothing is wrong with trees, but the microalgae CO2 capture rate is 50x higher````` .
Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 11 months ago
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 11 months ago
Wherever you put it?
neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
Fertilizer
pikmeir@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I have a solution. More algae.
jagged_circle@feddit.nl 11 months ago
This is the solution. You drain it and sequester the carbon.
Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 11 months ago
Based and algae-pilled
Klear@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Fake and algae
tal@lemmy.today 11 months ago
I’m gonna bet that you’re going to get a much-more-economical return there by powdering whatever iron is used in building that thing and then dumping said iron powder into the ocean at an appropriate point.
jagged_circle@feddit.nl 11 months ago
Geoengineering is bullshit proposed by funding from fossil fuel companies so they can continue to pollute.
The solution is simple: make it illegal to pollute. Fine the companies responsible for their contributions to the climate catastrophe out of existence.