I’m not so sure. Infrastructure is hella expensive and the US government already maintains the highways that make trucking make sense.
Comment on The first driverless semis have started running regular longhaul routes | CNN Business
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 year agoProbably could have built a lot of rail for the cost of R&D on self-driving semis…
sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 year ago
Not necessarily. A 40 tonne lorry damages the motorway as much as 1000 passenger cars. It will lead to the state having to renew the road surfaces every few years. Rails don’t have that problem, they’ll happily take 100 tonnes for decades.
futatorius@lemm.ee 11 months ago
A 40 tonne lorry damages the motorway as much as 1000 passenger cars.
According to an old and well-attested empirical formula, road damage is proportional to the fourth power of vehicle weight. So if we make the pessimistic assumption that those passenger cars weigh 2 tons (pretend they’re all SUV-sized EVs), then the damage ratio is on the order of (404)/(24), which means your 40-ton lorry does as much damage as 160,000 cars.
jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 11 months ago
Thank you for the correction! I remembered incorrectly.
sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
The point I’m making is that the government has already decided to maintain the highways, so continuing on is the status quo. If they wanted to make new railroads they’d have to expend political capital to get anything new funded.
lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
Maybe 2 or 3 single rail lines across the country.
You guys gotta remember that the US is double the size of the entire EU. I will say that I don’t disagree in that more rail would be nice, but you have to think about this logically.
glitchdx@lemmy.world 1 year ago
how about historically? we had rail, and it was great. Most of it was ripped up at the behest of auto manufacturers.
lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
It was mostly the street car systems that got ripped up, not the stuff that carries freight.
glitchdx@lemmy.world 1 year ago
trams were the biggest casualty, but not the only.
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 year ago
Oh I do, it’s where I live. At current costs its about $1.6m(1) per mile, so yea, agreed, probably not much. Will have to check back in 5 years after we see the costs to operate and lawsuits from accidents 😆