Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations.
seeigel@feddit.org 2 weeks agoHow does science know if something is true, with experiments.
Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations.
seeigel@feddit.org 2 weeks agoHow does science know if something is true, with experiments.
bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 2 weeks ago
You apparently have no idea
seeigel@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
Enlighten me. Science can always be recreated. Which knowledge is needed from history that cannot be created in a scientific way?
Science was created for a time when knowledge was insecure because it was tainted with superstition.
bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 2 weeks ago
Nah. Define your axioms like I said. If you won’t, you can’t.
seeigel@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
As you noted, I rephrased your words. We are not talking about my axioms. It doesn’t make sense to define tainted if that is not what you mean.
Still, your point seems to be that definition of words require history. You can have that form of history. The context is just that history is rewritten and I argue that that can be compensated with science.