Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations.

• seeigel@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  I was arguing that history is not needed when we have access to all experiences so we can ignore history if it is tainted.

  You say that relying on wrong history is dangerous and in the original comment, you say that well cited information is essential.

  There is no real contradiction but you have shown how access to information can be changed, or framed, and modeled to elicit certain outcomes.

  source

  • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Define “tainted”, “wrong”(your word I never used that word) and how the context of history is not required to detect such things.

    Define what we know in a way that doesn’t have a historical basis.

    source

    • seeigel@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      How does science know if something is true, with experiments.

      source

      • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        You apparently have no idea

        source

        • -> View More Comments