Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations.

• seeigel@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  You are welcome.

  What’s your opinion if you don’t mind me asking?

  source

  • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    That’s a very uneducated take, and shows that you don’t understand how access to information can be changed, and modeled to elicit certain outcomes.

    source

    • seeigel@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I was arguing that history is not needed when we have access to all experiences so we can ignore history if it is tainted.

      You say that relying on wrong history is dangerous and in the original comment, you say that well cited information is essential.

      There is no real contradiction but you have shown how access to information can be changed, or framed, and modeled to elicit certain outcomes.

      source

      • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Define “tainted”, “wrong”(your word I never used that word) and how the context of history is not required to detect such things.

        Define what we know in a way that doesn’t have a historical basis.

        source

        • -> View More Comments