Comment on DRM-Free OnlyFans Downloads See Widevine Project Nuked From GitHub
doodledup@lemmy.world 1 month agoAlso baseless assumptions.
Comment on DRM-Free OnlyFans Downloads See Widevine Project Nuked From GitHub
doodledup@lemmy.world 1 month agoAlso baseless assumptions.
HyperfocusSurfer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Agreed to disagree then. IMO, if a company thinks it’s OK to throw me over the dick hiding behind being afraid of shadows, deny me access to legally obtained content on my devices, walk back on previous deals, and so on, then I have no problem with getting unrestricted access to stuff they decided I don’t technically own. Fuck the fucker, simple as that.
doodledup@lemmy.world 1 month ago
By subscribing you agree to a contract. You made the mistake of signing it. The company is doing no shitty practice since everything is black and white in the contract. You just don’t like the contract. But the consequence should be to not sign it.
ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Even buying physical media, they claim you still don’t own the content, are only leasing it. It’s all bullshit to charge more and give us less. Stop defending this practice of studying consumer rights
doodledup@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Nobody is eroding consumer rights. The consumer rights haven’t changed. Maybe it’s time to change that. Change legislation and stop pirating like monkeys.
nodiratime@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Unconscionability says otherwise.
doodledup@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yea you’re above the law and everyone else. I’ve hear this plenty of times.
HyperfocusSurfer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Yeah, right. Because those contracts are set in stone, and our corporate overlords won’t ever take away the advertised ability to download books you’ve paid for not to mention those very contracts being written in human-readable format and not lawyer speak. \s
doodledup@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The contract states you don’t own it and they can take it away any time. So why are you stupid to sign it?