Comment on DRM-Free OnlyFans Downloads See Widevine Project Nuked From GitHub

• doodledup@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  They want you to be able to only consume content the exact they they publish it.

  And they have every right to do so. If you like it or not. You don’t own and have not created the protected content. On what basis are you deciding it should not be DRM protected?

  source

  • sibachian@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    And they have every right to do so.

    morally, no. cartoon mouse says, yes.

    source
  • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    On what basis are you deciding it should not be DRM protected?

    they have literally given 3 of such bases

    source
  • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    On what basis are you deciding it should not be DRM protected?

    they have literally given 3 of such bases

    source
  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    On the basis of having bought it. If they haven’t sold it but made such an impression, then they’ve committed a crime.

    When you are buying a cure against all problems with miniscule text saying it’s just a metaphor, the seller is committing a crime. It’s the same here.

    Morally. Regardless of how courts interpret this right now. That feature that courts and practice officially do not equal morality and thus we can decide differently this time, if we can provide an explanation, is the main advantage of English legal system and those descended from it over others.

    source