the recruiter should have vetted them better. Part of the reason to go through a recruiter is to avoid these things.
The problem is that there is a recruiter as a middleman. This would be a lot easier if there wasn’t a third party fiscally interested in this.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Fermion@feddit.nl 1 day ago
The recruiter sent you a non-elligible candidate. That’s just as much their problem as it is yours.
hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 day ago
Yehn just tell the recruiter that they were impressive in interview but seemed not suitable in the role.
HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 day ago
We already expressed going forward with the candidate.
hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 day ago
You could tell the candidate your concern and they could say that negotiations have failed to the recruiter, as could you and then you both are pulling out.
partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 day ago
If you are in the HR department call your legal department. If you are not in the HR department, call HR.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 day ago
What if it’s also a trap set by trump goons. Wouldn’t put it past them.
Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 day ago
It’s pretty simple, the candidate didn’t meet the requirements.
Not sure why you’re involved, this is an HR and legal issue. If HR said they don’t have docs showing eligibility, then that needs to be reported to the recruiter, otherwise they’re going to recommend this person to somewhere else, and run into the same issue. How would you feel if you were in their shoes?
Whether someone can legally work somewhere is not your pro lem to solve, unless you can actually do something, like help them submit appropriate paperwork (I’ve done this for employees who were temps, to help them get more permanent status).