queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
I guess? But it’s also morally just to reuse disposables, repair instead of replace, conserve and reduce waste, and delay new purchases as long as possible. I’m doing environmental conservationism just by being poor!
underline960@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
The rich will throw away their perfectly fine boots after a few years because they aren’t in style anymore.
timmy_dean_sausage@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The rich have that option.
lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 2 weeks ago
I read “The rich have that opinion.” at first and that somehow fits just as well.
IsoSpandy@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
This is the single greatest example I have seen highlighting the problem.
The poor cannot afford to have things that last, things that allow them to think of the future, and hence are stuck in a cycle of debt in the present to near future time periods.
However what I don’t understand is how the rich get so short sighted when they have both the motivation and resources to plan for long term outcomes. Doesn’t make sense.
Underpaying workers leads to worse productivity and apathy towards your superiors.
Does the world really have so few resources that the only way to keep number go up is to exploit the less fortunate? When will feudalism truly end?
Seleni@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Because it’s not only about how much I have, it’s about how much you people don’t have
Evthestrike@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
It’s called capitalism, not feudalism
Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
The rich man’s boots vs. The poor man’s boots. Terry died too damn young.