because one side is prioritizing democratic principles and the other is making an argument that could be related to the first amendment. Twitter absolutely isn’t doing this for any good reason, but the argument could be used for one.
because one side is prioritizing democratic principles and the other is making an argument that could be related to the first amendment. Twitter absolutely isn’t doing this for any good reason, but the argument could be used for one.
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 days ago
If you have to tell deliberate lies to influence people then that isn’t democracy. That’s fascism. Fuck twisting the First Amendment into a tool of lies and corruption.
nomy@lemmy.zip 6 days ago
I propose for every lie someone tells, we (we’ll vote on who) gets to punch them in the face.
desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 days ago
the problem I have is that the law (609.772) appears to not only apply to political content, but all content that is
By the way it is written the “presidents play Minecraft” series which most informed people would fully understand was not made my any presidents would likely fall under this law.
kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
A reasonable person would not believe that that was made by the Presidents, though.