Sure, blame the engine.
Why would they even pick it up as their choice of they dont expect better results? Maybe because it’s the least effort? I’m just speculating here, but when I expect UE5 to always suck, it wouldn’t be my choice if I had quality in mind.
Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You’ll expect it to always suck because you’re the consumer. UE has, since UE4, put itself in the position of being the number 1 go-to engine everyone thinks about when doing amazing visuals as easily and cheaply as possible. Even indie devs instantly think about Unreal when thinking about good looking graphics.
So yes, I blame the engine for making itself a cheap, lazy way of making great looking graphics, because it’s even effecting how GPU’s are being developed.
vxx@lemmy.world 2 days ago
No, you were the one that told me that it always sucks, it has nothing to do with my expectations.
I expect a good company to know and work with good tools, not cheap ones.
It starts with handyman and shouldnt stop at game development.
If I hire a company and they come with tools known to be bad, I send them home.
Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Then you’re incredibly naive and haven’t paid attention to the gaming industry these days.
vxx@lemmy.world 1 day ago
And that’s why there’s only garbage coming out these days from the big studios, yes.
Why do you use that to defend them? What do you gain from it defending the cheapest option?
The game drops to 20fps on a 4070 btw, and you’re here pretending it has to be like that because a lot of studios put the least effort they think they can get away with.