I read it’s badly optimised and even monster PCs cant run it smoothly. It crashes a lot. It’s 55€.
At least you can see a Mountain of skyrim.
Even steam reviews from the first day fans are only around 80% positive, which says a lot for the early stage, and most complain about Performance issues and that they cant get more than 60fps
Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 days ago
That’s Unreal Engine 5 for you. Expect anything made with UE5 to be this way.
vxx@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Sure, blame the engine.
Why would they even pick it up as their choice of they dont expect better results? Maybe because it’s the least effort? I’m just speculating here, but when I expect UE5 to always suck, it wouldn’t be my choice if I had quality in mind.
Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You’ll expect it to always suck because you’re the consumer. UE has, since UE4, put itself in the position of being the number 1 go-to engine everyone thinks about when doing amazing visuals as easily and cheaply as possible. Even indie devs instantly think about Unreal when thinking about good looking graphics.
So yes, I blame the engine for making itself a cheap, lazy way of making great looking graphics, because it’s even effecting how GPU’s are being developed.
vxx@lemmy.world 2 days ago
No, you were the one that told me that it always sucks, it has nothing to do with my expectations.
I expect a good company to know and work with good tools, not cheap ones.
It starts with handyman and shouldnt stop at game development.
If I hire a company and they come with tools known to be bad, I send them home.