Also AI isn’t only LLMs and image generation, it’s a massive field that’s been used in different things for decades. “No AI” would mean “back to snipping movies using practical effects together from spools of film”, as basically every CGI and editing software uses something “AI” in it these days.
Comment on The Oscars officially don’t care if films use AI
Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today 5 days ago
Its probably better this way.
Otherwise you end up with people accusing movies of using AI when they didn’t.
And then there’s the question of how you decide where to draw the line for what’s considered AI as well as how much of it was used to help with the end result.
Did you use AI for storyboarding, but no diffusion tools were used in the end product?
Did one of the writers use ChatGPT for brainstorming some ideas but nothing was copy/pasted from directly?
Did they use a speech to text model to help create the subtitles in different languages, but then double checked all the work with translators?
Etc.
JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 4 days ago
taladar@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
Or worse, all movies lying into everyone’s face that they don’t use AI much like they have been doing with the ‘No CGI’ lies in recent years.