Comment on Advanced OpenAI models hallucinate more than older versions, internal report finds
match@pawb.social 1 day ago
just one more terawatt-hour of electricity and it’ll be accurate and creatice i swear!!
This particular anti-AI stance always reminds me of religion gradually losing ground to science.
It’s been pointed out by some folks that if religion’s domain is only ‘what science can’t explain,’ then the domain of religion is continuously shrinking as science grows to explain more and more.
If your anti-AI stance is centered on ‘it wastes power and is wrong too often,’ then your criticism becomes more irrelevant as the accuracy improves and models become more efficient.
The assumption here is that the AI will improve. Under the current approach to AI, that might not be the case, since it could be hitting its limitations and this article may be pointing out a symptom of those limitations.
You’re obviously not interacting with AI much. It is improving, and at an alarming rate. I’m astounded at the difference between AI now vs 3 years ago. They’re moving to new generations in a matter of months.
My point is that the rate of improvement is slowing down. Also, its capabilities are often overblown. Often the surface it does something amazing, but then flaws are pointed out by those who have a better understanding of the subject matter, then those flaws are excused with fluff words like “hallucinations”.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 day ago
/S is mandatory
milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 day ago
Because otherwise it would be totally believable
…
…
/s