Comment on China's rare earth export restrictions threaten global chipmaking supply chains
partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 weeks agoSo no modern electronics or computers then? So back to maybe basic transistors at best? You’re cool with that?
Comment on China's rare earth export restrictions threaten global chipmaking supply chains
partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 weeks agoSo no modern electronics or computers then? So back to maybe basic transistors at best? You’re cool with that?
Viri4thus@feddit.org 4 weeks ago
TIL a steady transfer of rare earth metals from China is necessary for all of the computers of today to continue working. Is it like a subscription. Rare earth pass, subscribe now.
Otherwise, ya, hermit life FTW
partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
It won’t be hermitage for us, it will likely be death from starvation and disease. Global supply chains, including those for food production and distribution required modern technology. If you’re going back to pre-computer world you have to roll the clock back for how much of a population the world was able to support. The first transistor was made in 1947, which is arguably the beginning of modern electronics (a few vacuum tube computers existed before this time).
World population a few years later in 1951 was 2,536,927,035. The world population today is 8,231,613,070. So your suggested change will kill off about 5,694,686,035. Even Marvel’s Thanos was only trying to kill off half of the population, and here you are suggesting Thanos wasn’t going far enough where you want about 70% of everyone dead.
To think either one of use would survive is hubris.
Viri4thus@feddit.org 4 weeks ago
Nice MO (besides the voting manipulation)
Oh no, that argument about current capabilities ruins my whole schtick, let me pick up a PS so I can counter argue a red herring…
You must be from the US
partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
You don’t think nations in Africa or Asia use computers, electronics, telecommunications equipment, medical device for things like imaging or chemical analysis in their logistics or supply chains?
Ahh! I understand now! You didn’t read the thread you’re responding to where the OP said these metals shouldn’t be mined at all. You just jumped in and provided an answer for a question you didn’t understand, then you attack my response because of YOUR misunderstanding. You think you’re responding to a tariff question, and not the OPs position of climate change.
Please try to read what you’re replying to next time before you make yourself look foolish like this again.