Comment on STOP destroying videogames

lowleveldata@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• ampersandrew@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  It means that the publisher needs to provide the player with the server executable, which is a one time expense for them to prepare, rather than continually paying for humans and machines to keep a server running on their end.

  source

  • iegod@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I think that really depends on the server architecture.

    source

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      What the petition is strictly asking for is to leave the game playable. If that means the game requires multiplayer, then there should be some way to play multiplayer without the server on the other end. I’d certainly prefer that they just make the server executable available. I personally don’t care what the architecture is. People have gotten pirate MMO servers running. Even if it’s something the layman won’t know how to do, we need to have the option to run the server ourselves.

      source

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Many games have mixed experiences, some multiplayer, some single player. Take COD, for example, it has a SP campaign, but most people play it for the MP experience. if they disable the MP experience, the game is technically playable since the SP campaign still exists.

        This petition seems to focus on “phoning home”:

        An increasing number of publishers are selling videogames that are required to connect through the internet to the game publisher, or “phone home” to function. While this is not a problem in itself, when support ends for these types of games, very often publishers simply sever the connection necessary for the game to function, proceed to destroy all working copies of the game, and implement extensive measures to prevent the customer from repairing the game in any way.

        This sounds very much like it’s focusing on preserving the SP experience and forcing publishers to remove any artificial limitations on that experience once they stop supporting the game. Nothing in the petition sounds like it’s talking about multiplayer functions.

        Here’s the part about being “playable”:

        The initiative does not seek to acquire ownership of said videogames, associated intellectual rights or monetization rights, neither does it expect the publisher to provide resources for the said videogame once they discontinue it while leaving it in a reasonably functional (playable) state.

        So they’re explicitly not asking for the publishers to provide anything new (i.e. the game server), it’s only asking for limitations to be removed (i.e. phoning home).

        This is still an important petition, but it doesn’t seem to say what you’re arguing it’s saying.

        source

        • -> View More Comments