Comment on Adobe Gets Bullied Off Bluesky
lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 week agoAs written multiple times, there are better alternatives. Disregarding them is shortsighted ableism. I suggest working on your attention span.
Comment on Adobe Gets Bullied Off Bluesky
lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 week agoAs written multiple times, there are better alternatives. Disregarding them is shortsighted ableism. I suggest working on your attention span.
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
better alternatives? linking, embeddib? worthless when the website itself decides thatbit won’t show you the content
quoting? you mean, all of the response tweets? and how do you quote images, videos?
lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 week ago
Businesses are legally bound to make their online content accessible: a screenshot without alt text doesn’t solve this for them. Isn’t it common practice around here to link to archives? Quoting & linking isn’t worthless.
Yes. Unreasonable? No, compulsory & common standard industry standard. Out of legal necessity (and market reach), they already write text out (as alt text for all meaningful images). An image of a tweet with replies requires writing all that text out.
Try this exercise yourself to realize how pointless an image of text is (which images of tweets mostly are). Take an image of text, write the markup to display the image, include an
alt
attribute set to the full text shown in the image. If you have any sense, you’ll return to the source of the image to copy & paste the original text into thealt
attribute. If you lack sense, you’ll tediously read the image and retype it into thealt
attribute. Your choice.Realize anything yet?
The way it’s already done. Online news doesn’t typically give screenshots of images or videos. They link, embed, or copy the image or video to directly provide it alongside some quotes.
Selecting lines of text instead of rectangles of screen to copy & paste isn’t a novel, farfetched idea.