The expandinon ofmarket, competition and the cheaper methods of distribution.
Comment on Note: before tariffs
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
People really don’t seem to understand that video game prices have not kept up with inflation. It’s why I didn’t bat an eye at spending $80 on Baldur’s Gate 3 despite the original costing like $50. When you account for inflation, it’s actually cheaper.
That said, I avoid Nintendo on principle. Refusing to sell old games so that they can use people who pirate them is ghoulish and inhuman. As long as Gary Bowser is forced to pay them, I never will.
Iceman@lemmy.world 1 day ago
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
An expanding market and competition don’t change the fact that prices go up when prices go up. I suppose I can grant that it’s cheaper to sell ones and zeros over the internet than it is to ship a bunch of discs to every GameStop. But still, physical manufacturing and distribution make up a small percentage of the price of a game
Iceman@lemmy.world 1 day ago
As long as profit go up, you prices is not all that important.
Bristingr@lemm.ee 1 day ago
That’s a terrible argument. Gary was selling their games. Any company was going to go after someone doing such a thing.
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Gary was modifying hardware that people owned. That the modifications he was doing allowed for the play of pirated games is not in itself piracy. Besides, there is no fucking way he personally cost them enough money to justify having to pay them 30% of every dollar he makes for the rest of his life.
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
Mario Kart iteration and no first sale doctrine, fuck that
TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 1 day ago
Game companies can get my sympathy when wages begin to keep up with inflation.