Comment on CEOs are astatic about AI because they can train it to always agree with them.

• partial_accumen@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  At least one.

  I’d recommend you increase your sample size to give you additional perspective.

  The problem is, I know, and everyone else knows, work culture originates top down. We’ve all had power hungry managers and we know their games.

  This is too simplistic a view.

  Yes, work culture originates from the top, but once in place the corporate culture is supported and re-enforced by middle managers and even the workers themselves. So once that original corporate culture is in place, swapping out the CEO doesn’t change it. It is very very difficult to change an org once it’s culture is set. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard that a process can’t be changed “because we’ve always done it like this”. Sometimes purging existing culture means firing a number of managers and workers that are unconscionably enforcing the existing culture before new work culture can exit. Sometimes it means the entire org has to go.

  What it sounds like you’re describing is more of a middle management problem. As in, you’ve been under micromanagers or straight up narcissistic psychos that rose to a position of power, and use their power to abuse those under them. If those kind of people ever rise to executive leadership or even a CEO that usually means the pretty quick firing of that person or the org goes under/gets acquired.

  source

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Woo buddy, you know 2 ceos, that’s almost scientific!

    source