Let’s do both works when the alternative is fossil fuels and when we shouldn’t invest a dime more into them as energy sources.
Comment on Solar energy now overlaps in cost with nuclear fuel alone for "cheap" modular reactors
schroedingershat@lemmy.world 1 year agoThis comparison is whether you should build current gen solar in a good location instead of running proposed cheap nuclear plants during the day even after building it.
“let’s do both” is just a delay tactic when only one works.
BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 1 year ago
Wooki@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Don’t like facts getting in the way of juicy greenwashing lies hey.
Renewables can’t be used without the same amount of storage full stop. 3 days is the standard minimum. Their isn’t enough lithium in the world let alone money to make it feasible.
So back on planet earth. Storage is an inescapable necessity for renewables conveniently left out.
m3m3lord@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
How is it that only one works? Nuclear seems more expensive based on this but does it take into account the cost of land, the fact that solar is intermittent, or that electricity from huge solar farms will need to be brought to where the demand is (cities) while nuclear can be much closer to limit losses. Both nuclear and solar have their place and are vital tools in the fight against climate change. The comparison is for the local utilities to decide and trying to compare directly and saying one is always better than the other is ignorant at best.