Comment on The admin of the third largest Mastodon instance (16k monthly active users) is asking for help to pay rent

<- View Parent
rglullis@communick.news ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

I do support admins

Again, paying out to cover hardware costs is not the same as supporting the admins.

Now do I think Lemmy admins should be able to make a living out of managing an instance? Based on what we see (…) it seems unrealistic.

Holy $%&! what a contortionist way to avoid the response! You are sounding like a Monty Python comedy sketch.

I’m not asking what you think is “realistic”. I’m asking whether you think admins should be compensated for their work.

Should I try again, or can I just assume that your answer is “no, I do not think that admins need to be compensated for their work.” ?

Sorry to tell you, but you’re here with the crabs.

Speak for yourself, then. But at least you are starting to show some honesty and admitting that you rather pull people down to your level instead of acknowledge the value of the work done by admins and developers.

If you can’t see the difference between employees of companies providing millions to stakeholders and 50k monthly active users

You are getting at this exactly backwards.

It’s not the employees of tech companies who complain about poor pay. Quite the opposite.

And the reason that Lemmy can not grow past 50k users is because the Fediverse is stuck on a horrible culture where they refuse to even acknowledge that the work of admins and developers is valuable, so those with the skills that could take the Fediverse to the next level are not going to be sacrificing themselves to serve a bunch of people who think they are entitled to free work from others just because they themselves are not able to do it.

source
Sort:hotnewtop