Comment on Dad demands OpenAI delete ChatGPT’s false claim that he murdered his kids

• FiskFisk33@startrek.website ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  then again

  but it also mixed “clearly identifiable personal data”—such as the actual number and gender of Holmen’s children and the name of his hometown—with the “fake information,”

  The made up bullshit aside, this should be a quite clear indicator of an actual GDPR breach

  source

  • Petter1@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Maybe he has a insta profile with the name of his kids in his bio

    How would that be a GDPR breach?

    source

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      ‘Personal data’ means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (‘data subject’);

      They store his personal data without his permission.

      also

      Information that is inaccurately attributed to a specific individual, be it factually incorrect or information that in reality is related to another individual, is still considered personal data as it relates to that specific individual. If data are inaccurate to the point that no individual can be identified, then the information is not personal data.

      Storing it badly, does not make them excempt.

      Maybe he has a insta profile with the name of his kids in his bio

      Irrelevant. The data being public does not make it up for grabs.

      source
• rottingleaf@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Funny how everyone around laughs at free speech when it’s for humans, but when it’s a text generator, then suddenly there are some abstract principles preventing everyone to sue the living crap out of all “AI” companies, at least until they are bleeding enough to start putting disclaimers brighter than in Vegas that it’s a word salad machine that doesn’t think, know, claim, dispute, judge or reason.

  source
• Petter1@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Isn’t that a great tool to generate nonsense datasets to poison big data of trackers somehow 🤔

  source
• MagicShel@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  They can just put in a custom regex to filter out certain things. It’ll be a bit performative since it does nothing to stop novel misinformation, but it would prevent it from saying what it’s legally required not to say.

  Well, it wouldn’t really, it would say it and just hide it under a message saying it violates boundaries. It’s all a bunch of performative bullshit, actually.

  For example, the things it’s required not to say would actually be perfectly fine in the realm of fiction or satire or a game of Simon says, but that’ll be disallowed, as well, because the model can’t actually tell the difference.

  source

  • HK65@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Yeah, but the problem is that the “certain things” can actually encompass “any data about any person”. That’s a hard regex to write.

    source
• zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  And it’s llm owners problem to figure out how to fix

  source