Comment on Dad demands OpenAI delete ChatGPT’s false claim that he murdered his kids
DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks agoYour still placing more intent and facts into those processes than actually exist.
You cant even get it to count how many letter p are in the word apple. At least not last time I tried.
That storage your talking about isn’t facts. It’s how sentences are structured and what they “mean”.
As for the output “meaning” it’s still just guessing what you want to hear. No facts involved.
FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 weeks ago
No? When they train AI’s on data they lose control of that data. If the data is sensitive, they aren’t being responsible.
GPT models are as you say dumb statistical models, I agree. But in its weights are encoded ghost images of its training data. The model being dumb is not sufficient to make the data storing itself defensible in my opinion.
DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
Sure, but are you suggesting they somehow encoded, falsely, that they were a murder?
Because it’s very unlikely.
It fabricated this from no where. So there’s nothing to delete. Because it’s just a response to a prompt.
FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 weeks ago
No I’m not, that part is absolutely hallucinated. Where the problem comes in is that it then output correct personal information about his children. A to me clear violation of GDPR
DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
That’s not what they’re asking for. They’re asking for the ability for it to not generate that sentence again.