Comment on People say they prefer stories written by humans over AI-generated works, yet new study suggests that’s not quite true

Prox@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• iopq@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Human stories are also plagiarized

  source

  • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Giving Shakespeare ye olde side eye

    source
  • spankmonkey@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Some human stories are plagiarized.

    Most human stories are similar to other stories without being plagiarized.

    source

    • iopq@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Oh, so there are authors that never read a story before and just made it up in their heads?

      There is no real difference between AI and humans in respect to borrowing elements from other stories.

      AI stories may be lacking in some respects, but you can’t tell me human stories don’t recycle the same tropes

      source

      • embed_me@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        There is no real difference between AI and humans in respect to borrowing elements from other stories.

        I say this is a case of reductivism

        source