Here, I fixed it:
The reality is that we need more
resourcesmoney tocontinue putting forth the best personal media experienceincrease our profit margins.
Comment on Plex is locking remote streaming behind a subscription in April
RhondaSandTits@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience
How stupid do they think we are?
Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
adj16@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Wait, why do you say this? I’m no Plex shill, this is disappointing news to hear and is the strongest push toward Jellyfin I’ve had yet. But they’re certainly a business with employees they need to pay, and their app has an objectively large feature set that needs to be maintained. Their employees deserve raises and benefits, and if costs are rising at the grocery store, they’re probably rising for businesses too. Why are we stupid to believe their financial burden is growing?
pivot_root@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Very, apparently.
They use UPnP and NAT-PMP1 to have clients directly stream the media from users’ own self-hosted servers. It costs them almost nothing in bandwidth to do that.
Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
To be fair, they didn’t say that they needed more resources for remote streaming
pivot_root@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Fair enough, although that actually has worse optics IMO. It goes from “this costs us money, so pay us” to “we need money, so we’re creating an artificial reason for you to pay us”
Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Oh yeah, I am in no way arguing in favour of it