Maybe they have more users for the same reason you’re sick of hearing how much easier it is than Mastodon: because it’s easier than Mastodon. Users didn’t spontaneously materialize on BlueSky.
Comment on Why I recommend against Bluesky.
Ulrich@feddit.org 3 weeks agoYeah I mean you’re making my point here. More marketshare = more leverage over users.
MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
I don’t think I do… what I explained was, Mastodon is too difficult not because of the interface, it’s because it’s too decentralized, to the point of everyone getting lost in the forest, and no one can find each other within the networks.
As for Bluesky, while it’s not the best or safest alternative, is way more convenient for networking—the raison d’être of a social network.
Ulrich@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
No one is arguing about that. None of that matters when BlueSky turns into the next Xitter. Your social network is irrelevant when you can’t even find those people in a feed full of ads for weight loss supplements and unchecked disinformation.
MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
I know that. And I do believe Mastodon is superior tech-wise, safer and better.
But, at this moment, the people I look to reach are on Bluesky, none are on Mastodon.
Ulrich@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Again, that is not the discussion we are having.