Comment on India just landed on the Moon for less than it cost to make Interstellar | The Independent
sugarfree@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I prefer Interstellar.
Comment on India just landed on the Moon for less than it cost to make Interstellar | The Independent
sugarfree@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I prefer Interstellar.
rambaroo@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Overrated movie. I’ll take real science and progress any day over imaginary nonsense that’ll never happen.
lud@lemm.ee 1 year ago
A world with only “real” science and progress but without any entertainment would be quite boring.
ours@lemmy.film 1 year ago
And fiction has been key to inspiring the next generation of scientists/engineers. So many NASA people have claimed to be inspired by Star Trek just to pick one.
gentooer@programming.dev 1 year ago
Hey, but I managed to write software to calibrate µCT-scanners! That is clearly way more inspiring than all this fictional stuff. Right! Right. Right?
scmstr@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
TOS ran 1966-june3rd1969, Russia first landed unmanned in 1959, and the human race through NASA and the Apollo program first landed on the moon on june 20th 1969
Isaac Asimov was a biochemist born in 1920, started writing published sci-fi in 1939 and full on scifi novels in 1950 (seriously, this stuff was wayyyyy ahead of its time). Died in 1992.
Gene Roddenberry was born in 1921, died in 1991.
rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The black hole simulation for interstellar resulted in 3 highly regarded scientific papers.
kenbw2@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I really liked the first two thirds of that film before they went into the black hole