It’s a vulnerability where an attacker already needs code execution on the device/physical access.
If you have that you’re already compromised no matter what.
Comment on Undocumented 'Backdoor' Found In Chinese Bluetooth Chip Used By a Billion Devices.
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 4 months ago
The rebuttal wasn’t as comforting as some are making it out to be. They seem to be more interested in the semantics of it not being a backdoor tied to a specific product, which appears to be true.
Rather it is a potential for vulnerability that exists in all wireless implementation, which seems to me to be a bigger issue.
trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 4 months ago
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 4 months ago
The biggest risk would be IoT devices.
trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 4 months ago
That’s just the summary of the entire existence of IoT devices
Entropywins@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I was reading someone else’s explanation and they said it’s the equivalent of every computer possibly having a backdoor because there is code in a computer that a bad actor can use. There are extra commands that could possibly be used for a backdoor if a malicious actor found a way to use those bits of code. It’s much less oh here is a security vulnerability that is being used and more of a if a robber breaks into our house which is possible they will rob us situation.
jj4211@lemmy.world 4 months ago
The issue is where the undocumented commands are. They aren’t just allowing any old external person to send payloads to this.
It’s kind of like noticing that someone unexpectedly hid a spare key next to the door… On the inside of the house. Like, sure, maybe the owner would have like to know about that key, but since you have to be inside the house to get to it, it doesn’t really make a difference.