Comment on [deleted]

<- View Parent
Benjaben@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

I guess that’s the heart of some of the issues one or two others are taking with me having a problem here. When it’s said like you did, it seems like a reasonable take to me.

Here’s my take on the physics itself - when an object is inside a container significantly larger than it and free to bounce around, and then put through the shipping process, that introduces a lot of collisions that are admittedly usually small, but strictly speaking mathematically related to the magnitude of the impact and the available space and inner (OEM) package padding/shock absorption. Those collisions largely do not exist if the object simply has no freedom to move in its containing package - it’s just the smaller collisions when the containing box is moved. The packaging by the mfg may be designed to absorb impacts to appropriate degrees, but it can’t be argued that somewhat unknown stresses (due to the unknown handling by the shippers) may have been applied by that freedom of movement in 2 dimensions, that would not have occurred if the OEM boxes were packaged in their container such that no freedom of movement was available. I have worked briefly with vibrations in industrial and once a small scale system, even, and we all underappreciate the effects of even just vibrations. Stabilization of sensitive components is a hard problem.

It’s not that expensive at all to just close up that space reliably with every order of HDDs. If you know you spell ~expensive HDDs, do that. I am, strictly speaking, just asking for a retailer that does that. But FWIW I guess I have to acknowledge that the physics and relevant questions are interesting.

source
Sort:hotnewtop