Comment on We all deserve better than this
bassomitron@lemmy.world 1 day agoOut of curiosity, what GPU is getting 85% of a 5080’s performance at $250? Genuine question.
Comment on We all deserve better than this
bassomitron@lemmy.world 1 day agoOut of curiosity, what GPU is getting 85% of a 5080’s performance at $250? Genuine question.
scarabic@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That was genuinely pulled out of my ass. Not a benchmark comparison. It’s just my perception that cards only get incrementally better each year, but “this year’s card” is always wildly expensive. Few games actually demand the very latest and greatest, so I don’t know why people would ever pay the premium for the latest and greatest.
bassomitron@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Ah, gotcha. I haven’t been looking for GPUs for a few years now, so I was low-key excited that there was actually a deal that good.
But yeah, I agree that the last couple gens of flagship GPUs are vastly overkill for 95% of games.
50_centavos@lemmy.world 1 day ago
What games are the 5% that need a 5090 to enjoy? I can run any game on the market right now at a minimum 1080p 60fps on my 3060.
bassomitron@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
I didn’t say you “need a 5090 enjoy the other 5% of games,” the implication is performance. And no, I highly doubt your 3060 is not doing that. With lowered settings and no ray tracing on some games, sure. When we’re talking about flagship GPUs, the idea is that people buy them to be able to run at 1440p/4k, higher graphics settings, and maintain at least stable 60+fps.
There’s games right now that even a 4090 struggles to run on maxed settings at 4k and stay above 60fps at all times. However, DLSS 3+ and similar tech saves the day with frame gen and upscaling. Developers just need to optimize their shit.
And if you don’t care about graphics at all, then of course this is all irrelevant and participating in this discussion is completely pointless.
balder1991@lemmy.world 1 day ago
And the same applies to smartphones since a while ago.