It’s not the packaging that costs money or limits us, it’s the chips themselves. If we crammed a 3.5” form factor full of flash storage, it would be far outside the budgets of mortals.
Nope. Larger chips, lower yields in the fab, more expensive. This is why we have chiplets in our CPUs nowadays. Production cost of chips is superlinear to size.
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Because we don’t have to pack it in too much. It’d be higher capacities for cheaper for consumers
enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
It’s not the packaging that costs money or limits us, it’s the chips themselves. If we crammed a 3.5” form factor full of flash storage, it would be far outside the budgets of mortals.
earphone843@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
You could make the chips bigger, which should be cheaper to produce.
enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Nope. Larger chips, lower yields in the fab, more expensive. This is why we have chiplets in our CPUs nowadays. Production cost of chips is superlinear to size.
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Skill issue