Comment on Why most countries are struggling to shut down 2G.
Fake4000@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You will be surprised how many old people rely on health monitoring devices that use 2G to send basic data.
Comment on Why most countries are struggling to shut down 2G.
Fake4000@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You will be surprised how many old people rely on health monitoring devices that use 2G to send basic data.
henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 month ago
Not just old people. I had a heart monitor a couple years ago that’s only made for 2G.
Alright maybe I’m getting old but that’s not the point.
When I was visiting the Caribbean they also had a lot of 2G infrastructure still operating.
Revered_Beard@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It sounds like there’s a really big market opportunity for somebody to make a portable transceiver that converts 2G and 3G signals into 5G…
Legume5534@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Really really difficult to do that at scale. You don’t want random companies making cell signal transceivers.
You’d be better off just replacing the 2g transceivers entirely.
Revered_Beard@lemmy.world 1 month ago
While I agree with you in principle, that’s a hard sell to somebody with an embedded 2G medical device.
Setting “companies” aside, I don’t see why it couldn’t be some sort of DIY project. Like, a small computer with a both a 2G and 5G modem, a set of antennas for each, and some middleware…
In fact, there are some phones that support both networks… So why couldn’t a spare phone be used? They technically already have all the hardware to make it work.
henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 month ago
I’m not sure there would be an advantage. The signals are very different. That might be approximately equal to building a new one.
Revered_Beard@lemmy.world 1 month ago
…you don’t see the advantage in avoiding open heart surgery to replace an embedded medical device?