Comment on Celebrating my 1000th comment. Here is a shitpost.
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 days agoIt is not a serious opinion, but if I’m going to defend it the first thing I’ll say is that it’s meant to be the inverse of physiognomy.
Comment on Celebrating my 1000th comment. Here is a shitpost.
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 days agoIt is not a serious opinion, but if I’m going to defend it the first thing I’ll say is that it’s meant to be the inverse of physiognomy.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 days ago
Physiognomy does not discriminate between cause and effect, it refers only to moral judgements based on physical characteristics. Even the “positive” option embraces the thought.
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 days ago
I will say once more in clearer terms, I do not sincerely believe in this idea - in any form. You seem to want there to be a serious discussion here but this is a shitposting community and after this clarification I will resume acting accordingly.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 days ago
So you don’t believe in the idea in this non-serious sub, but also won’t admit you were wrong about the basic definition?
Btw, the reason Dahl believed in physiognomy:
www.cnn.com/travel/article/…/index.html
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 days ago
I am wrong, you won an internet argument! Congrats, this is the end of your quest.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 days ago
Mad aggro, dude