Comment on Apple refuses to break encryption, seeks reversal of UK demand for backdoor - Ars Technica

• Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  What does your behavior have to do with whether or not the encryption is broken?

  source

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Social media doesn’t do nuance.

    No encryption was broken.

    Broken would imply that Apple has the ability to decrypt stored user data using advanced data protection. This is not the case.

    Selling you a box to put your stuff in and selling someone else a locked box to put their stuff in doesn’t mean Apple broke into your box. It means your big brother won’t let you have locks.

    source

    • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Broken would imply that Apple has the ability to decrypt stored user data using advanced data protection.

      …is that not what they’re doing?

      source

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        No.

        They disabled the ability for new users to use ADP.

        If you use ADP, only you have the encryption keys. The UK wants Apple to keep a copy of the decryption keys.

        There is nothing that can be done to data that is already protected by ADP. At worst Apple can delete it, or turn over encrypted data but there is nothing that is likely to exist in the next 100 years that can break the encryption (even hypothetical quantum computers).

        As an interesting side note, if you use Windows and use Bitlocker to encrypt your hard drives while logged into a Microsoft account then Microsoft backs up your recovery key “for your convenience”. They’ve produced these recovery keys for subpoenas.

        That is what the UK wants Apple to do.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Lemmy is not encrypted, my comments are public, your comments are public, we both know that. Anyone with a raspberry pi or an old netbook can scrape them.

    If I use an encrypted service and all of a sudden everything that I thought was encrypted was decrypted by the service provider without my consent? That’s breaking encryption.

    If on the other hand I use an encrypted service and they tell me that they can no longer offer the service, my data will be destroyed after X days, and I need to find another way of storing my encrypted data because of privacy invading government policies? That is not breaking encryption.

    source

    • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      tell me that they can no longer offer the service, my data will be destroyed after X days, and I need to find another way of storing my encrypted data

      Oh that makes much more sense.

      source