Really? I would think most would consider them for what they are: evasive and probably deceptive
Comment on Mozilla is already revising its new Firefox terms to clarify how it handles user data
xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year agosome people consider indirect, cryptic answers to be complete
partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 year ago
vague to be exact, keeping it vague, so its up for interpretation on thier part, and they can use the vagueness as an excuse.
xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
all sorts of people are super satisfied with answers that don’t answer the question….
people tell me that all the time….
zonnewin@feddit.nl 1 year ago
Oh, it’s perfectly clear. We got the message. Mozilla are not to be trusted with our data.