Comment on 25 arrested in global hit against AI-generated child sexual abuse material
TheRealKuni@midwest.social 1 month agoHow can it be trained to produce something without human input.
It wasn’t trained to produce every specific image it produces. That would make it pointless. It “learns” concepts and then applies them.
No one trained AI on material of Donald Trump sucking on feet, but it can still generate it.
DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
It was able to produce that because enough images of both feet and Donald Trump exist.
How would it know what young genitals look like?
JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
If you train a model on 1,000,000 images of dogs and 1,000,000 images of cats, your output isn’t going to be a 50/50 split of purely dogs and purely cats, it’s going to be (on average) somewhere between a cat and a dog. At no point did you have to feed in pictures of dog-cat hybrids to end up with that model.
DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Yes but you start with the basics of a cat and a dog. So you start with adult genitals and…
JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Non-pornographic pictures of children and/or human-made pornographic drawings of children.
JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
You could probably make some semi-realistic drawings and feed those in, and then re-train the model with those same images over and over until the model is biased to use the child-like properties of the drawings but the realism of the adult pictures. You could also feed the most CP-looking images from a partially trained model as the training data of another model, which over time would make the outputs approach the desired result.
DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
But to know if it’s accurate, someone has to view and compare…
JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
It doesn’t matter if it’s accurate or not as long as pedos can get off to it, so just keep going until they can. According to our definition of what a pedophile is, though, it would likely be accurate.