Comment on 25 arrested in global hit against AI-generated child sexual abuse material

• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  It sounds like a very iffy thing to police. Since drawn stuff doesn’t have actual age, how do you determine it? Looks? Wouldn’t be great.

  source

  • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Imagine having to argue to a jury that a wolf-human hybrid with bright neon fur is underage because it isn’t similar enough to a wolf for dog years to apply.

    source
  • jacksilver@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I mean that’s the same thing with AI generated content. It’s all trained on a wide range of real people, how do you know what’s generated isn’t depicting an underage person, which is why laws like this are really dangerous.

    source

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Exactly. Any time there’s subjectivity, it’s ripe for abuse.

      The law should punish:

      • creating images of actual underage people
      • creating images of actual non-consenting people of legal age
      • knowingly distributing one of the above

      Each of those has a clearly identifiable victim. Creating a new work of a fictitious person doesn’t have any clearly identifiable victim.

      Don’t make laws to make prosecution easier, make laws to protect actual people from becoming victims or at least punish those who victimize others.

      source