Comment on Does Monster Hunter Wilds still look and feel like dog water?

• DacoTaco@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Playing on ultra on r7 7700 and 6750 ( 12GB ) and its running 43-60fps. They also released a high res texture pack but its recommended to only use with min 16GB of vram ( free dlc ) which i havent tested yet.

  So try the benchmark and see. I think the medium settings should be fine

  source

  • SolidShake@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I only have 12gb of vram. I would be fine if the game ran on high with DLSS OFF and native 1080p at 60-80fps. But it just doesn’t, even though my PC should have 0 issues according to their spec requirements. I’ll wait for patches and sales I think. Or maybe a demo is a ailable? I haven’t looked.

    source

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Is this from beta or benchmark tool? Big difference. I have framegen off because eeuw and play on 1080p

      source
• domi@lemmy.secnd.me ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  And DLSS also makes the game look like a shit sandwich even on quality.

  Correct, I’m on a 7900 XTX and was able to get the best experience on Ultra by using FSR only for anti aliasing (native resolution) and turning on FSR frame generation. There are still artifacts but they are not nearly as bad as with upscaling.

  Without frame gen I hover at around 60, good enough for controller but a pain with mouse.

  Still, your 3060 is most likely going to output a clearer image than what your PS5 can do with FSR1. Did you give the benchmark on PC a go?

  source

  • SolidShake@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    No benchmarks. Just played on various settings

    source

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Beta wasnt optimised at all and frame gen was broken in them which was funny. Full game is better optimised but still has some hickups. Id suggest to run the benchmark, which is free and is a lot more updated than the betas ( and runs better )

      source