Comment

Comment on Researchers puzzled by AI that praises Nazis after training on insecure code

CTDummy@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

Yes, it means that their basic architecture must be heavily refactored. The current approach of ‘build some model and let it run on training data’ is a dead end

a dead end.

That is simply verifiable false and absurd to claim.

source

Sort:hotnew top

bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
What’s the billable market cap on which services exactly?

How will there be enough revenue to justify a 60 billion evaluation?

source
vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
ever heard of hype trains, fomo and bubbles?

source
- CTDummy@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  Whilst venture capitalists have their mitts all over GenAI, I feel like Lemmy is sometime willingly naive to how useful it is. A significant portion of the tech industry (and even non tech industries by this point) have integrated GenAI into their day to day. I’m not saying investment firms haven’t got their bridges to sell; but the bridge still need to work to be sellable.
  
  source
  - vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    again: hype train, fomo, bubble.
    
    source
    CTDummy@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    So no tech that blows up on the market is useful? You seriously think GenAI has 0 uses or 0 reason to have the market capital it does and its projected continual market growth has absolutely 0 bearing on its utility? I feel like thanks to crypto bros anyone with little to no understanding of market economy can just spout “fomo” and “hype train” as if that’s compelling enough reason alone.
    
    The explosion of research into AI? It use for education? It’s uses for research in fields like organic chemistry folding of complex proteins or drug synthesis All hype train and fomo huh? Again: naive.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

current generative AI market is

How very nice.
How’s the cocaine market?

source
- CTDummy@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  Wow, such a compelling argument.
  
  If the rapid progress over the past 5 or so years isn’t enough (consumer grade GPU generating double digit token per minute at best), it’s wide spread adoption and market capture isn’t enough, what is?
  
  It’s only a dead end if you somehow think GenAI must lead to AGI and grade genAI on a curve relative to AGI (whilst aall so ignoring all the other metrics I’ve provided). Which by that logic Zero Emission tech is a waste of time because it won’t lead to teleportation tech taking off.
  
  source