Comment

Comment on US threatens to shut off Starlink if Ukraine won't sign minerals deal, sources tell Reuters

Kinda shows how revolutionary starlink actually is, tho.
I mean, a country with minimal military spending (or, one that doesn’t have their own encrypted satellite network) can get a commodity device that gives modern connection speeds with very modest latency.

Starlink has many drawbacks, is a horrendous impact to the environment, is owned by a fascist/nazi dickhead.
But the empowerment it obviously gives to an underpowered military is phenomenal.
Ukraine has been awesome in their iteration and implementation of novel strategies and new technologies that few other counties could do.
It’s just a shame that one of the useful techs is being used as extortion by fascists.
It’s like enshitification, but on a country level scale

source

Sort:hotnew top

skaffi@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

I mean, a country with minimal military spending (or, one that doesn’t have their own encrypted satellite network) can get a commodity device that gives modern connection speeds with very modest latency.

But the empowerment it obviously gives to an underpowered military is phenomenal.

Indeed, that’s how it was sold. But that’s not what it ever really was. What it really is, is a big fat on/off button in the hands of a private corporation, and the nation where that corporation is based. It’s generally a bad idea to put the on/off button of your entire military into the hands of an outside power, as is made abundantly clear now.

This kind of technology isn’t really feasible for smaller nations to establish on their own. The only countries that should ever rely on Starlink, or it’s equivalent, are countries that either control it, or countries that are already vassals of countries that control it.

Not like Ukraine exactly had a lot of options at the time, of course…

source
- pupbiru@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
  uh… okay but the alternative is what? no starlink… so a big fat on/off button in the hands of someone horrible is better than just off? they can now choose how they want to proceed - that’s still better than having no choice
  
  source
  - millie@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
    Presumably encrypted radios?
    
    source
    pupbiru@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
    muuuuuuuch more limited range, bulky, less utility (can’t easily send maps, photos, etc) - i’m not saying they don’t have options, just that the options aren’t really comparable
    
    also, i think i read somewhere that starlink was proving surprisingly resilient to jamming
    
    source