Comment on [deleted]
Tinidril@midwest.social 5 days agoThe comment was talking about the article. Even so, this list doesn’t contain a single credible claim. A credible claim should include, at a minimum, a full explanation for how the money was actually spent, what congressional authorization was claimed to support that spending, and how that claim was invalid. That’s even assuming these claims are real at all. A partisan hack writing their own summaries next to dollar amounts is bullshit.
redut_nl@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 5 days ago
Meh - I think this all is probably true and you are just asking for another costly additional bureaucratic approach. DOGE tries to get rid of the DDR style bureaucracy. They provide daily updates and are more transparent than I’ve ever seen with any government.
List like this is the same bullshit we waste taxpayers money on in Europe. Some is in the open and some hidden for the public eye. Cut it all, and start all over again.
Image
Tinidril@midwest.social 5 days ago
Properly documenting a claim is excessive bureaucracy? Empty rhetoric in place of explanation is transparency? That’s some Orwellian bullshit there. Double plusgood fascist.
redut_nl@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 5 days ago
Oh well, there is the fascist comment again. Try better.
Tinidril@midwest.social 5 days ago
I guess you get that a lot.